In 1791, When the Second Amendment Was Written, All Guns Were “Military Style”April 14, 2023 In 1791, When the Second Amendment Was Written, All Guns Were “Military Style” 20 thoughts on “In 1791, When the Second Amendment Was Written, All Guns Were “Military Style”” Ron Johnson May 10, 2014 at 9:01 pm EXACTLY http://t.co/HpKuBJC6EQ Jake Palmateer May 10, 2014 at 9:37 pm “: In 1791, When the Second Amendment Was Written, All Guns Were “Military Style” ⇒ http://t.co/M8mmJhMjuI” @sarbetter Shaun Carney June 12, 2014 at 9:07 pm @AlliedTactical I like to say in the American Revolution, the musket and long rifle WERE assault weapons of their day Kris Murphy September 21, 2014 at 10:13 am Muskets were the “assault rifles” of that day. Civilians had parity with the military. Ａｒｒｅｓｔｅｄ Aplomb™ September 21, 2014 at 10:28 am And when the First Amendment was written, no distinction was made between citizen and “journalist”. Bill Mullen October 26, 2014 at 6:42 pm You mean like “assault” weapons? Jp November 20, 2015 at 1:23 pm and horses were the finest fastest mode of transport, #AlGore had not yet invented the #Internet and indoor plumbing nope Cam Kirmser November 20, 2015 at 3:45 pm @Gun_Shots And, the civilians were often better armed than the military – Kentucky Rifles vs. Muskets. Christopher Mahoney November 25, 2015 at 11:53 pm @Gun_Shots Militia Act (1792) required every citizen to own a gun. Every one. JOHN BRASHEAR November 26, 2015 at 12:06 am @Gun_Shots and the First Full Auto Machine GUN was designed in 1884 “The Maxim” kenneth DeLatte November 26, 2015 at 1:28 am and until Vietnam the soldiers were allowed to keep certain rifles Trace Urdan December 17, 2015 at 2:52 pm That was really the point after all… PaulieHussienWalnuts April 14, 2016 at 12:17 pm https://t.co/qUtQPQ5xY8 The Desert Wolf April 28, 2016 at 1:02 pm That’s not true. A large caliber British smoothbore musket with a bayonet lug was military. Rifles were for hunting. Adeptus Econicus April 28, 2016 at 1:48 pm @Gun_Shots and not just infantry rifles,it covered swords, modern field artillery, grenades, & naval guns. Nancy May 8, 2016 at 4:26 pm Pocket pistols? Charles Pence May 8, 2016 at 7:11 pm Exactly! My family was there. And let me tell you the sentiment runs deep. DEATH TO TYRANTS. Christian Larsen June 3, 2016 at 1:06 am Odd, how no one seems to grasp this fact. Ignorance is bliss??? TJ Martinell June 3, 2016 at 5:42 pm I don’t get the “rights are based on technology” argument. Freedom of press doesn’t just apply to 18th century newspapers JackD July 26, 2016 at 8:17 pm Comments are closed.
Jake Palmateer May 10, 2014 at 9:37 pm “: In 1791, When the Second Amendment Was Written, All Guns Were “Military Style” ⇒ http://t.co/M8mmJhMjuI” @sarbetter
Shaun Carney June 12, 2014 at 9:07 pm @AlliedTactical I like to say in the American Revolution, the musket and long rifle WERE assault weapons of their day
Kris Murphy September 21, 2014 at 10:13 am Muskets were the “assault rifles” of that day. Civilians had parity with the military.
Ａｒｒｅｓｔｅｄ Aplomb™ September 21, 2014 at 10:28 am And when the First Amendment was written, no distinction was made between citizen and “journalist”.
Jp November 20, 2015 at 1:23 pm and horses were the finest fastest mode of transport, #AlGore had not yet invented the #Internet and indoor plumbing nope
Cam Kirmser November 20, 2015 at 3:45 pm @Gun_Shots And, the civilians were often better armed than the military – Kentucky Rifles vs. Muskets.
Christopher Mahoney November 25, 2015 at 11:53 pm @Gun_Shots Militia Act (1792) required every citizen to own a gun. Every one.
JOHN BRASHEAR November 26, 2015 at 12:06 am @Gun_Shots and the First Full Auto Machine GUN was designed in 1884 “The Maxim”
kenneth DeLatte November 26, 2015 at 1:28 am and until Vietnam the soldiers were allowed to keep certain rifles
The Desert Wolf April 28, 2016 at 1:02 pm That’s not true. A large caliber British smoothbore musket with a bayonet lug was military. Rifles were for hunting.
Adeptus Econicus April 28, 2016 at 1:48 pm @Gun_Shots and not just infantry rifles,it covered swords, modern field artillery, grenades, & naval guns.
Charles Pence May 8, 2016 at 7:11 pm Exactly! My family was there. And let me tell you the sentiment runs deep. DEATH TO TYRANTS.
Christian Larsen June 3, 2016 at 1:06 am Odd, how no one seems to grasp this fact. Ignorance is bliss???
TJ Martinell June 3, 2016 at 5:42 pm I don’t get the “rights are based on technology” argument. Freedom of press doesn’t just apply to 18th century newspapers
EXACTLY http://t.co/HpKuBJC6EQ
“: In 1791, When the Second Amendment Was Written, All Guns Were “Military Style” ⇒ http://t.co/M8mmJhMjuI” @sarbetter
@AlliedTactical
I like to say in the American Revolution, the musket and long rifle WERE assault weapons of their day
Muskets were the “assault rifles” of that day. Civilians had parity with the military.
And when the First Amendment was written, no distinction was made between citizen and “journalist”.
You mean like “assault” weapons?
and horses were the finest fastest mode of transport, #AlGore had not yet invented the #Internet and indoor plumbing nope
@Gun_Shots And, the civilians were often better armed than the military – Kentucky Rifles vs. Muskets.
@Gun_Shots Militia Act (1792) required every citizen to own a gun. Every one.
@Gun_Shots and the First Full Auto Machine GUN was designed in 1884 “The Maxim”
and until Vietnam the soldiers were allowed to keep certain rifles
That was really the point after all…
https://t.co/qUtQPQ5xY8
That’s not true. A large caliber British smoothbore musket with a bayonet lug was military. Rifles were for hunting.
@Gun_Shots and not just infantry rifles,it covered swords, modern field artillery, grenades, & naval guns.
Pocket pistols?
Exactly! My family was there. And let me tell you the sentiment runs deep. DEATH TO TYRANTS.
Odd, how no one seems to grasp this fact. Ignorance is bliss???
I don’t get the “rights are based on technology” argument. Freedom of press doesn’t just apply to 18th century newspapers
Comments are closed.